WIN/LOSS RECORD
2005
Last Revision: 12/30/05
1. January 7th,
2005, PARTIES REDACTED; CIVIL CASE;
Won
0
Settled with High Leverage 0
Lost
1
Settled
0
Non-dispositive Motion of
Hearing
0
Unavoidable loss, but protected Client’s
interests 0
Draw
0
2. January 25,
2005, PARTIES REDACTED; CIVIL CASE;
Won
1
Settled with High Leverage 0
Lost
1
Settled
0
Non-dispositive Motion of Hearing 0
Unavoidable loss, but protected Client’s
interests 0
Draw
0
3. February 4,
2005, PARTIES REDACTED; CRIMINAL CASE;
Won 2
Settled with High Leverage
0
Lost
1
Settled
0
Non-dispositive Motion or
Hearing
0
Unavoidable loss, but protected Client’s
interests 0
Draw 0
4. February
9th, 2005, PARTIES REDACTED; CIVIL CASE;
Won 3
Settled with High Leverage
0
Lost
1
Settled 0
Non-dispositive Motion of
Hearing
0
Unavoidable loss, but protected Client’s interest 0
Draw 0
5. March 2,
2005, PARTIES REDACTED; CIVIL CASE;
Won 4
Settled with High Leverage
0
Lost
1
Settled
0
Non-dispositive Motion of
Hearing
0
Unavoidable loss, but protected Client’s interest 0
Draw 0
6. March 3,
2005, PARTIES REDACTED; CRIMINAL CASE; Cobb County State Court; Domestic
Violence, Battery, Simple Battery, The State filed a Nolle
Prosque, which means they decided not to prosecute
because, under all the facts and circumstances, the State could not prove guilt
beyond a reasonable doubt. This is a
very significant victory. It was
necessary to get this Nolle Prosque
changed to clear up our client’s spotless record, his reputation and his
position with the U.S. Government. This
was approximately an Eighteen month effort to rid this Client of these baseless charges. This is a settlement with extreme
High-Leverage. This is better than a
win, because it saves attorney’s fees. THIS IS THE BEST WIN SO FAR THIS YEAR.
Won
5
Settled with High Leverage
0
Lost
1
Settled
0
Non-dispositive Motion of
Hearing
0
Unavoidable loss, but protected Client’s interest 0
Draw
0
7. March 16,
2005, PARTIES REDACTED; CRIMINAL CASE;
Won
5
Settled with High Leverage
1
Lost 1
Settled
0
Non-dispositive Motion of
Hearing
0
Unavoidable loss, but protected Client’s
interests 0
Draw
0
8. March 22,
2005, PARTIES REDACTED; CRIMINAL CASE,
Won
5
Settled with High Leverage
2
Lost 1
Settled
0
Non-dispositive Motion of
Hearing
0
Unavoidable loss, but protected Client’s
interests 0
Draw
0
9. March 30 and
31, 2005, PARTIES REDACTED; CIVIL CASE;
Won
6
Settled with High Leverage
2
Lost
1
Settled 0
Non-dispositive Motion of
Hearing
0
Unavoidable loss, but protected Client’s
interests 0
Draw
0
10. April 15,
2005, PARTIES REDACTED; CIVIL CASE,
Won
6
Settled with High Leverage
2
Lost
1
Settled 1
Non-dispositive Motion of
Hearing
0
Unavoidable loss, but protected Client’s
interests 0
Draw
0
11. May 5, 2005
PARTIES REDACTED; CIVIL CASE; DeKalb Superior Court before Judge
Castellani, Motion For Contempt. After about a 4 to 5 hour conference with
Attorney Marks Bipps, a very good attorney from
Won
6
Settled with High Leverage
2
Lost 1
Settled 2
Non-dispositive Motion of
Hearing 0
Unavoidable loss, but protected Client’s interest 0
Draw 0
12. May 13,
2005, PARTIES REDACTED; CRIMINAL CASE;
Won
7
Settled with High Leverage
2
Lost 1
Settled 2
Non-dispositive Motion of
Hearing 0
Unavoidable loss, but protected Client’s interest 0
Draw 0
13. May 16,
2005, PARTIES REDACTED; CRIMINAL CASE;
Won
7
Settled with High Leverage
3
Lost 1
Settled 2
Non-dispositive Motion of
Hearing 0
Unavoidable loss, but protected Client’s interest 0
Draw 0
14. May 31,
2005, PARTIES REDACTED; CIVIL CASE;
Won 7
Settled with High Leverage
3
Lost 1
Settled 2
Non-dispositive Motion of
Hearing 0
Unavoidable loss, but protected Client’s interest 1
Draw 0
15. June, 2,
2005, PARTIES REDACTED; CRIMINAL CASE,
Won 7
Settled with High Leverage
3
Lost 1
Settled 2
Non-dispositive Motion of
Hearing 0
Unavoidable loss, but protected Client’s interest 2
Draw 0
16. June 17,
2005, PARTIES REDACTED; CIVIL CASE; Conference call with Judge Cynthia
Wright and Opposing Attorney John Wilson.
Won 7 Settled with High Leverage
3
Lost 1
Settled 3
Non-dispositive Motion of
Hearing 0
Unavoidable loss, but protected Client’s interest 2
Draw 0
17. June 21,
2005, PARTIES REDACTED; CIVIL CASE,
Won
7
Settled with High Leverage
3
Lost 1
Settled 3
Non-dispositive Motion of
Hearing 0
Unavoidable loss, but protected Client’s interest 3
Draw 0
18. June 24,
2005, PARTIES REDACTED; CIVIL CASE; Fulton County Superior Court. Judge
Cynthia Wright. Issue was whether client
should receive $33,000.00 or owe one-half of Wife’s IRA as equitable
distribution. This was a LOSS.
Won
7
Settled with High Leverage 3
Lost 2
Settled 3
Non-dispositive Motion of
Hearing 0
Unavoidable loss, but protected Client’s interest 3
Draw
0
19. July 8,
2005, PARTIES REDACTED; CRIMINAL CASE;
Won
7
Settled with High Leverage 4
Lost 2
Settled 3
Non-dispositive Motion of
Hearing 0
Unavoidable loss, but protected Client’s interest 3
Draw 0
20. July 13,
2005, PARTIES REDACTED; CIVIL CASE;
Won
8
Settled with High Leverage
4
Lost 2
Settled 3
Non-dispositive Motion of
Hearing 0
Unavoidable loss, but protected Client’s interest 3
Draw 0
21. July 27,
2005, 1:00 pm: PARTIES REDACTED; CRIMINAL CASE;
Won
9
Settled with High Leverage
4
Lost 2
Settled 3
Non-dispositive Motion of
Hearing 0
Unavoidable loss, but protected Client’s interest 3
Draw 0
22. July 15,
2005, PARTIES REDACTED; CIVIL CASE;
Won
10
Settled with High Leverage
4
Lost 2
Settled 3
Non-dispositive Motion of
Hearing 0
Unavoidable loss, but protected Client’s interest 3
Draw 0
23. August 2,
2005, PARTIES REDACTED; CIVIL CASE;
Won
11
Settled with High Leverage
4
Lost 2
Settled 3
Non-dispositive Motion of
Hearing 0
Unavoidable loss, but protected Client’s interest 3
Draw 0
24. August 5, 2005, PARTIES REDACTED; CIVIL CASE;
Won
11
Settled with High Leverage 4
Lost 2
Settled 4
Non-dispositive Motion of
Hearing 0
Unavoidable loss, but protected Client’s interest 3
Draw 0
25. August 22,
2005. PARTIES REDACTED; CIVIL CASE. This was an Administrative Hearing to take
her license away, according to the Dept. of Service’s rules for one year for
failure to blow at a DUI stop and arrest.
The Officer did not appear. The
case was dismissed. This was an easy WIN.
Won
12
Settled with High Leverage
4
Lost 2
Settled 4
Non-dispositive Motion of
Hearing 0
Unavoidable loss, but protected Client’s interest 3
Draw 0
26. August 23,
2005, PARTIES REDACTED; CIVIL CASE; Gwinnett Superior Court, before Judge
Ronnie K. Bachelor. Defendant did not
answer and yet there were more problems with the case than imaginable, about an
hour Hearing to try to sort out problems in the case. The Judge agreed with all of our
requests. This is a BIG, BIG WIN! I had not
idea it would even be possible.
Won
13
Settled with High Leverage
4
Lost 2
Settled 4
Non-dispositive Motion of
Hearing 0
Unavoidable loss, but protected Client’s interest 3
Draw 0
27. August 25,
2005, PARTIES REDACTED; CIVIL CASE;
Won
14
Settled with High Leverage
4
Lost 2
Settled 4
Non-dispositive Motion of
Hearing 0
Unavoidable loss, but protected Client’s interest 3
Draw 0
28. August 30,
2005, PARTIES REDACTED; CRIMINAL CASE;
Won
14
Settled with High Leverage
4
Lost 2
Settled 5
Non-dispositive Motion of
Hearing 0
Unavoidable loss, but protected Client’s interest 3
Draw 0
29. September 7
2005, PARTIES REDACTED; CIVIL CASE;
Won 14
Settled with High Leverage
4
Lost 2
Settled 6
Non-dispositive Motion of
Hearing 0
Unavoidable loss, but protected Client’s interest 3
Draw 0
30. September
13, 2005, PARTIES REDACTED; CRIMINAL CASE; Doraville Municipal
Court. Speeding
Ticket. Pled. This is a SETTLEMENT.
Won
14
Settled with High Leverage 4
Lost 2
Settled 7
Non-dispositive Motion of
Hearing 0
Unavoidable loss, but protected Client’s interest 3
Draw 0
31. September
23, 2005, at 2:25pm. PARTIES
REDACTED; CIVIL CASE;
Won
15
Settled with High Leverage
4
Lost 2
Settled 7
Non-dispositive Motion of
Hearing 0
Unavoidable loss, but protected Client’s interest 3
Draw 0
32. September 23, 2005, 4:00 pm. PARTIES REDACTED; CRIMINAL CASE, before Judge Stripling. Enticement Of A Child For Indecent Purposes. Judge Stripling said this was Aggravated and thus, he would need the District Attorney’s Office to be there when he set Bond. He let me view the facts and as such they were indeed an Aggravated situation. I mentioned to the Judge that there was no Aspertasion. The Judge asked if that was a requirement. I said YES. I have the law. He said never mind I will look it up myself. He went in to his office for about 30 to 45 minutes. Come back. He said Mr. Billington you are absolutely right. I will dismiss the Enticement to a Child case and set your Bond on the remaining Criminal Warrant at $3,500.00.